Getting a right to manage service with transparent pricing, specialist guidance, and regional access remains difficult for leaseholders and resident groups. Many providers hide fees or restrict support to legal representation without covering company formation and statutory notice preparation. These four alternatives let leaseholders and resident groups choose a service that matches their building, guidance needs, and budget.
Table of Contents
- RightToManage.co.uk
- Gorvins Solicitors
- Vincents Solicitors
- MWG Solicitors
- Comparison of alternatives
RightToManage.co.uk

At a Glance
Clients are covered by £1 million indemnity cover. The service works on a transparent, fixed fee model and handles eligibility checks, company formation, notices, and process management. It does not act as a solicitor and operates within England and Wales.
Core Features
RightToManage.co.uk carries out eligibility assessment and gives clear guidance before any RTM step. The team forms a compliant RTM company with the prescribed articles and prepares and serves statutory notices, including Section 78 and Section 79. The service also analyses resident participation and offers guidance on handling freeholder objections, with tribunal support quoted separately.
Key Differentiator
The defining point is specialist RTM guidance that focuses on compliance to reduce procedural errors and tribunal risk. The founder, Paul McCarthy, brings practical leasehold dispute experience dating from 2018, which informs the pre claim checks and notice preparation. That compliance emphasis makes the process more predictable for resident groups.
Pros
The fixed fee structure gives predictable costs for the initial RTM stages and avoids hidden charges. Guidance follows statutory requirements to lower the chance of claim failure, and the service includes comprehensive checks before notices are served. Clients benefit from professional handling backed by £1 million indemnity cover, which supports confidence in procedural accuracy.
Cons
- Does not provide legal representation or conduct tribunal hearings; contested tribunal work is quoted and charged separately.
Who It's For
This service suits leaseholders and resident groups in private residential buildings who have sufficient participation to meet RTM criteria. It fits small and medium sized blocks and mixed use buildings where the structure meets eligibility rules. The ideal client wants guided, professional support to gain management control without buying the freehold.
Unique Value Proposition
A clear, fixed fee that typically starts from around £500 plus Land Registry costs gives predictable upfront outlay. That pricing model covers company formation and notice preparation, so groups can plan budgets before committing. Predictable costs combined with compliance focused checks reduce risk of procedural mistakes and unexpected fees later.
Real World Use Case
A leaseholder group in London completed a preliminary assessment with RightToManage.co.uk and then formed an RTM company. The service prepared and served statutory notices and advised on freeholder objections. The group progressed to assume management functions after the statutory period and preparation was complete.
Pricing
Pricing is a fixed fee that varies by building size, complexity, and resident participation. Typical starting charges are around £500 plus Land Registry fees for company formation and notices. Contested tribunal work and any legal representation are billed separately and quoted on request.
Website: https://righttomanage.co.uk
Gorvins Solicitors

At a Glance
Gorvins Solicitors reports ratings in Legal 500 and Chambers and Partners. The firm is regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority, which governs professional standards for solicitors. The practice combines family, corporate and military work with a reputation for client care.
Core Features
Gorvins supplies a full range of legal services across personal, business, family and military law, and it handles disputes, claims and advocacy. The team emphasises approachable client contact and hands-on case management. Regulatory status and directory recognition support the firm’s public profile.
Key Differentiator
The firm’s stated strength is an approachable, highly rated legal team that covers multiple specialist areas while serving police and military clients. That focus places Gorvins apart from niche providers that specialise only in Right to Manage claims. Gorvins suits clients who need broad legal support rather than a single-purpose RTM service.
Pros
Gorvins is well regarded for family, corporate and military law, and the firm cites strong client testimonials praising professionalism and approachability. The team offers both individual and business services, so clients can keep related matters under one roof. Regulation by the Solicitors Regulation Authority gives a baseline of professional oversight.
Cons
-
Costs are not published, so you must contact the firm for a fee estimate.
-
The website gives limited detail on specific fee structures or fixed-fee options.
-
Individual outcomes depend on the solicitor assigned, so experiences may vary between lawyers.
When It May Not Fit
If you need a national specialist for Right to Manage claims, a dedicated RTM provider may be a better match. Clients based outside the North West should check whether the firm will take instructions in their area. Organisations that require transparent online pricing will find the lack of published fees inconvenient.
Who It's For
This firm suits individuals and businesses in the North West who want experienced solicitors for family, corporate, personal injury or military matters. It also meets the needs of police and service personnel seeking advisers familiar with military or police contexts. Clients who prefer local face to face contact will value the regional presence.
Real World Use Case
A business owner with a commercial property dispute instructs Gorvins for urgent advice and representation in negotiations and court. The firm prepares pleadings, runs settlement talks and represents the client at hearings. The single-firm approach keeps commercial and property issues under one legal roof.
Pricing
Fees are not listed on the public site and the firm asks prospective clients to contact them for a quote. Expect matter-specific estimates rather than standard online pricing for complex litigation. Ask for a written fee plan or costs estimate before you sign a retainer.
Website: https://gorvins.com
Vincents Solicitors

At a Glance
120 staff operate across seven locations in Lancashire and the wider UK. The firm covers family law, conveyancing, wills and probate, medical negligence and commercial matters. Community sponsorship and local events form a visible part of their public work.
Core Features
Vincents handles personal and business legal work from divorce and estate planning to commercial property and company law. The team aims to explain legal options in plain English and supports clients with FAQs, news and testimonials on its site. Multiple offices let clients choose local appointments or a face to face meeting.
Key Differentiator
The defining trait is plain language guidance combined with active local engagement. Clients often see accessible explanations rather than dense legal prose. That focus makes the firm easier to work with for people who want straightforward advice and community presence.
Pros
Approachable, knowledgeable staff make routine matters less intimidating and reduce the time spent explaining basics to clients. Clear, plain English communication helps people understand options and likely next steps without legal jargon. A broad service mix means clients can use one firm for family law, conveyancing and business matters while relying on local office availability.
Cons
- Trustpilot reviews and other feedback indicate occasional concerns with responsiveness and cost transparency.
- Given the breadth of services, some clients may want to verify specialist experience for niche disputes or complex medical negligence claims.
- As a larger firm, the level of personalised attention can vary by office and by individual solicitor.
When It May Not Fit
Clients who want an exclusively online or remote only service will find Vincents less suited to their needs. People requiring the same solicitor for every interaction may encounter variability across locations. Those needing a narrow specialist for highly technical disputes should check individual solicitor credentials first.
Who It's For
Individuals, families and small to medium sized businesses in Lancashire and across the UK who prefer clear explanations and local contact points. People wanting a single firm to cover both personal and commercial matters will find the service mix helpful.
Real World Use Case
A family seeking divorce guidance and an estate plan books meetings at the local office for face to face advice and document drafting. A small business in Lancashire engages the firm to review a commercial lease and negotiate terms with the landlord.
Pricing
Fees are not explicitly specified on the site. Typical legal fees vary by service type and case complexity, so cost depends on matter scope and solicitor seniority. Contact the firm for a tailored fee estimate before instruction.
Website: https://vincentssolicitors.co.uk
MWG Solicitors

At a Glance
Fixed fees and telephone or remote consultations are standard options at MWG Solicitors. The firm reports high client satisfaction in numerous testimonials. MWG operates from Manchester and emphasises transparent pricing and regular client communication.
Core Features
MWG handles family law, conveyancing, immigration, personal injury, wills and probate, dispute resolution, landlord and tenant, and commercial matters. The team offers fixed fee options alongside hourly rates and provides telephone and remote consultations for convenience. Solicitors give regular updates and direct representation throughout cases.
Key Differentiator
MWG pairs regional knowledge of Manchester with a client focused approach and clear pricing. That local focus helps when cases need knowledge of regional courts, local conveyancing practice, or landlord and tenant norms. The firm promotes straightforward fees to reduce billing uncertainty for clients.
Pros
An experienced team covers a wide spectrum of private and business work, so clients rarely need multiple firms. Fixed and transparent fees reduce surprise bills and aid budgeting. Regional knowledge in Manchester and frequent client testimonials back the firms reputation, and remote consultations make access easier for busy clients.
Cons
- Legal aid not currently offered. This rules out publicly funded representation for eligible claimants.
- Fees and total costs vary with case complexity and the level of representation required. Final charges may be higher for contested or prolonged matters.
- Limited information is available about an online client portal or self service resources. Clients who prefer web based case tracking may find details scarce.
When It May Not Fit
If you require legal aid funded representation, MWG is not suitable. If your matter needs national high volume capacity rather than regional attention, look for a larger firm. Clients who demand a detailed online portal should check availability before instructing the firm.
Who It's For
Private individuals and families in Manchester who want clear pricing and local legal expertise will find MWG suitable. Small and medium sized businesses needing commercial law or dispute support in the region can use their services. People seeking flexible consultation options will appreciate telephone and remote appointments.
Real World Use Case
A Manchester resident facing a contested divorce can contact MWG for case assessment, a fixed fee estimate for defined work, and remote appointments to reduce travel. A buyer completing a local property transfer can use the firms conveyancing service with regular updates. An individual with an immigration application can book an initial consultation and receive document guidance and representation.
Pricing
MWG uses a mix of fixed fees and hourly rates depending on the service and case. Specific prices vary by matter and complexity, so the firm gives tailored cost estimates. Initial consultations are sometimes free and sometimes chargeable depending on the nature of the case.
Website: https://mwgsolicitors.co.uk
Comparison of alternatives
When assessing legal providers for Right to Manage processes, it becomes clear that specialist expertise defines the decision landscape. While firms such as MWG Solicitors and Vincents Solicitors provide broad legal coverage, their offerings may lack the precision necessary for RTM compliance, placing them behind RightToManage.co.uk in this focused niche.
Expertise and Specialisation
RightToManage.co.uk excels in delivering support for RTM claims through its dedicated services, such as compliance-focused pre-claim evaluation and notice preparation, giving it an advantage in procedural accuracy. However, when broader legal concerns beyond RTM arise, Vincents Solicitors' versatile service mix allows businesses and families to consolidate various legal matters under one firm, reducing logistical complexity.
Accessibility and Transparency
MWG Solicitors offers fixed-fee options and remote consultation accessibility, which simplifies engagements for clients requiring convenient setups. Their fee transparency and client satisfaction ratings further enhance their reputation among private individuals and families. Conversely, Gorvins Solicitors, while praised for their approachable and professional team, does not disclose fees upfront, potentially complicating financial planning for prospective clients.
Best fit
- Leaseholder groups aiming for RTM compliance and reduced procedural risks will find RightToManage.co.uk the most aligned provider.
- Clients desiring accessibility through clear pricing and remote consultation should consider MWG Solicitors.
- Businesses preferring consolidated legal services across diverse areas will benefit from Vincents Solicitors' offerings.
- Individuals seeking guidance with approachable legal expertise, especially in family or military matters, may value Gorvins Solicitors.
Our pick
Leaseholder groups seeking focused expertise to reduce risks and ensure procedural compliance will find righttomanage.co.uk to be an ideal choice. While competitors such as MWG Solicitors excel in accessibility, and Vincents Solicitors provide versatile legal services, the niche specialisation of RightToManage.co.uk in RTM compliance aligns uniquely with the needs of resident groups pursuing management rights.
Choosing the ideal Right to Manage service depends on pricing transparency, specialist guidance, and compliance standards.
| Service Provider | Core Feature | Best For | Pricing | Notable Limitation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RightToManage.co.uk | RTM company formation and notice serving | Leaseholder groups needing specific RTM support | Starting from £500 plus fees | Does not offer direct legal representation |
| Gorvins Solicitors | Full legal services for family and corporate law | Individuals and businesses seeking broad legal support | Price not published | Limited fixed fee information available |
| Vincents Solicitors | Plain English legal guidance | Families and businesses seeking local, clear advice | Price not published | Responses and costs vary by location |
| MWG Solicitors | Fixed-fee legal support with regional expertise | Private and business clients in Manchester region | Price not published | Limited detailed online service offerings |
How can leaseholders handle freeholder challenges and management frustrations?
Leaseholders and resident groups often face problems like poor managing agents, excessive service charges, and limited transparency. These issues complicate building management and frustrate those seeking better oversight without owning the freehold. Righttomanage specialises in guiding leaseholders through the Right to Manage process. Their service includes eligibility checks, company formation, and handling vital Section 78 and Section 79 notices to protect clients from procedural errors and freeholder objections.
Righttomanage offers a fixed-fee package that clarifies costs upfront and reduces the risks of mistakes that can delay or derail claims. For leaseholders in private residential buildings looking to regain management control with professional support, visit Righttomanage to review clear steps and begin your application.
Righttomanage ensures your group's claims proceed with legal accuracy so you can lead building management confidently and transparently.
Explore how Righttomanage guides you through every stage and receive tailored advice suited for your block.
FAQ
How does Righttomanage's fixed fee structure benefit clients?
Righttomanage offers a clear, fixed fee that typically starts from around £500 plus Land Registry fees. This pricing model covers company formation and notice preparation, making budgeting easier for resident groups. Clients can manage their finances with confidence before starting the process.
What is the difference between Gorvins Solicitors and Righttomanage?
Gorvins Solicitors is well regarded for its broad range of legal services, including family and military law. Righttomanage, however, focuses specifically on Right to Manage services, offering expert guidance and compliance for resident groups seeking management control. This makes Righttomanage a better fit for those needing targeted assistance in this area.
Which platform offers tribunal support as part of its services?
Righttomanage provides guidance on handling freeholder objections, with tribunal support quoted separately. Clients can prepare for potential disputes with a clear understanding of the process and what to expect if issues arise.
Can I rely on Righttomanage for legal representation during tribunal hearings?
Righttomanage does not provide legal representation or conduct tribunal hearings. Clients requiring such services must look elsewhere, as contested tribunal work is quoted and charged separately, so they should consider their needs carefully.
What specific compliance checks does Righttomanage perform before serving notices?
Righttomanage includes comprehensive checks before notices are served to lower the chance of claim failure. This proactive approach bolsters procedural accuracy and assures clients that they are following statutory requirements correctly.
